TY - JOUR
T1 - Simple echocardiographic scoring in screening aortic stenosis with focused cardiac ultrasonography in the emergency department
AU - Furukawa, Atsuko
AU - Abe, Yukio
AU - Morizane, Atsushi
AU - Miyaji, Tsuyoshi
AU - Hosogi, Shingo
AU - Ito, Hiroshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: No established methodology exists for diagnosis of aortic stenosis (AS) using focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of our developed visual AS score for screening AS in an emergency department. Methods: Seventy-two emergency outpatients with suspected cardiovascular disease were studied. Emergency physicians assessed the visual AS score in addition to conducting the standard FOCUS, and then the aortic valve area index (AVAI) was measured by expert sonographers in the echocardiography laboratory. AVAI values >0.85 cm2/m2, 0.6–0.85 cm2/m2, and <0.6 cm2/m2 were defined as no or mild AS, moderate AS, and severe AS, respectively. Results: Seventeen (24%) patients had moderate or severe AS. Visual AS scores assessed by emergency physicians and by expert sonographers showed excellent agreement (κ = 0.93), and a strong association was noted between the visual AS score assessed by emergency physicians and the AVAI assessed by expert sonographers (R = –0.71, p < 0.0001). A visual AS score ≥3 assessed by emergency physicians had a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 95% for diagnosing moderate or severe AS. The prevalence of new-onset AS-related events during hospitalization was higher in patients with visual AS score ≥3 assessed by emergency physicians than in the remaining patients [7 (50%) vs. 2 (3%), p < 0.0001]. Conclusion: The visual AS score is a useful AS screening tool for emergency physicians who are not expert cardiologists.
AB - Background: No established methodology exists for diagnosis of aortic stenosis (AS) using focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of our developed visual AS score for screening AS in an emergency department. Methods: Seventy-two emergency outpatients with suspected cardiovascular disease were studied. Emergency physicians assessed the visual AS score in addition to conducting the standard FOCUS, and then the aortic valve area index (AVAI) was measured by expert sonographers in the echocardiography laboratory. AVAI values >0.85 cm2/m2, 0.6–0.85 cm2/m2, and <0.6 cm2/m2 were defined as no or mild AS, moderate AS, and severe AS, respectively. Results: Seventeen (24%) patients had moderate or severe AS. Visual AS scores assessed by emergency physicians and by expert sonographers showed excellent agreement (κ = 0.93), and a strong association was noted between the visual AS score assessed by emergency physicians and the AVAI assessed by expert sonographers (R = –0.71, p < 0.0001). A visual AS score ≥3 assessed by emergency physicians had a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 95% for diagnosing moderate or severe AS. The prevalence of new-onset AS-related events during hospitalization was higher in patients with visual AS score ≥3 assessed by emergency physicians than in the remaining patients [7 (50%) vs. 2 (3%), p < 0.0001]. Conclusion: The visual AS score is a useful AS screening tool for emergency physicians who are not expert cardiologists.
KW - Aortic stenosis
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Emergency department
KW - Focused cardiac ultrasound
KW - Point-of-care ultrasonography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098630694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098630694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.12.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.12.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 33386216
AN - SCOPUS:85098630694
SN - 0914-5087
VL - 77
SP - 613
EP - 619
JO - Journal of Cardiography
JF - Journal of Cardiography
IS - 6
ER -