TY - JOUR
T1 - Specific heat and electronic states of superconducting boron-doped silicon carbide
AU - Kriener, M.
AU - Maeno, Y.
AU - Oguchi, T.
AU - Ren, Z. A.
AU - Kato, J.
AU - Muranaka, T.
AU - Akimitsu, J.
PY - 2008/7/24
Y1 - 2008/7/24
N2 - The discoveries of superconductivity in the heavily-boron doped semiconductors diamond (C:B) in 2004 and silicon (Si:B) in 2006 have renewed the interest in the physics of the superconducting state of doped semiconductors. Recently, we discovered superconductivity in the closely related "mixed" system heavily boron-doped silcon carbide (SiC:B). Interestingly, the latter compound is a type-I superconductor whereas the two aforementioned materials are type II. In this paper, we present an extensive analysis of our recent specific-heat study, as well as the band structure and expected Fermi surfaces. We observe an apparent quadratic temperature dependence of the electronic specific heat in the superconducting state. Possible reasons are a nodal gap structure or a residual density of states due to nonsuperconducting parts of the sample. The basic superconducting parameters are estimated in a Ginzburg-Landau framework. We compare and discuss our results with those reported for C:B and Si:B. Finally, we comment on possible origins of the difference in the superconductivity of SiC:B compared to the two "parent" materials C:B and Si:B.
AB - The discoveries of superconductivity in the heavily-boron doped semiconductors diamond (C:B) in 2004 and silicon (Si:B) in 2006 have renewed the interest in the physics of the superconducting state of doped semiconductors. Recently, we discovered superconductivity in the closely related "mixed" system heavily boron-doped silcon carbide (SiC:B). Interestingly, the latter compound is a type-I superconductor whereas the two aforementioned materials are type II. In this paper, we present an extensive analysis of our recent specific-heat study, as well as the band structure and expected Fermi surfaces. We observe an apparent quadratic temperature dependence of the electronic specific heat in the superconducting state. Possible reasons are a nodal gap structure or a residual density of states due to nonsuperconducting parts of the sample. The basic superconducting parameters are estimated in a Ginzburg-Landau framework. We compare and discuss our results with those reported for C:B and Si:B. Finally, we comment on possible origins of the difference in the superconductivity of SiC:B compared to the two "parent" materials C:B and Si:B.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48449105168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48449105168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.024517
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.024517
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:48449105168
SN - 1098-0121
VL - 78
JO - Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
JF - Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
IS - 2
M1 - 024517
ER -