TY - JOUR
T1 - Stenting for pulmonary artery stenosis complicated by univentricular physiology
T2 - Subanalysis of JPIC stent survey
AU - Fujii, Takanari
AU - Tomita, Hideshi
AU - Otsuki, Shinichi
AU - Kobayashi, Toshiki
AU - Ono, Yasuo
AU - Yazaki, Satoshi
AU - Kim, Sung Hae
AU - Nakanishi, Toshio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Japanese College of Cardiology.
Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Background and purpose: Stent implantation is an important treatment option for pulmonary artery stenosis (PS), even if complicated by univentricular physiology (UVP). However, there is paucity of evidence concerning not only its hemodynamic and morphologic indications but also on markers for its optimal target attainment in UVP. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute outcome and factors associated with efficacy of stenting for PS complicating UVP. Methods and subjects: A subanalysis was performed using the data of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Interventional Cardiology (JPIC) stent survey. We analyzed the morphologic and hemodynamic data of 11 patients with UVP who underwent stenting for PS. We defined "a 50% increase in the minimum lumen diameter (MLD)" as "morphologically effective," and "an achievement of 0. mmHg pressure gradient" as "hemodynamically effective." We analyzed the success rate for each criterion and determined factors which may have contributed to hemodynamic effectiveness. Results: Stenting was morphologically effective in all patients, while it was hemodynamically effective in 6/11 (55%). The percent diameter stenosis after stenting was significantly lower in the "hemodynamically effective" group (2.5. ±. 5.5% vs 19.6. ±. 13.1%, p=. 0.017). The cutoff value of percent diameter stenosis after stenting to "hemodynamically effective" was 14.6%; the sensitivity was 80% and the specificity was 100% (area under the curve 0.825, p=. 0.021). Conclusions: The percent diameter stenosis after stenting significantly contributed to achieving a "0. mmHg" pressure gradient, while in order to achieve a "0. mmHg" pressure gradient, the residual percent diameter stenosis should be less than around 15%.
AB - Background and purpose: Stent implantation is an important treatment option for pulmonary artery stenosis (PS), even if complicated by univentricular physiology (UVP). However, there is paucity of evidence concerning not only its hemodynamic and morphologic indications but also on markers for its optimal target attainment in UVP. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute outcome and factors associated with efficacy of stenting for PS complicating UVP. Methods and subjects: A subanalysis was performed using the data of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Interventional Cardiology (JPIC) stent survey. We analyzed the morphologic and hemodynamic data of 11 patients with UVP who underwent stenting for PS. We defined "a 50% increase in the minimum lumen diameter (MLD)" as "morphologically effective," and "an achievement of 0. mmHg pressure gradient" as "hemodynamically effective." We analyzed the success rate for each criterion and determined factors which may have contributed to hemodynamic effectiveness. Results: Stenting was morphologically effective in all patients, while it was hemodynamically effective in 6/11 (55%). The percent diameter stenosis after stenting was significantly lower in the "hemodynamically effective" group (2.5. ±. 5.5% vs 19.6. ±. 13.1%, p=. 0.017). The cutoff value of percent diameter stenosis after stenting to "hemodynamically effective" was 14.6%; the sensitivity was 80% and the specificity was 100% (area under the curve 0.825, p=. 0.021). Conclusions: The percent diameter stenosis after stenting significantly contributed to achieving a "0. mmHg" pressure gradient, while in order to achieve a "0. mmHg" pressure gradient, the residual percent diameter stenosis should be less than around 15%.
KW - Congenital heart disease
KW - Interventional cardiology
KW - Pulmonary artery
KW - Stent
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926260269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926260269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.02.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.02.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 24794272
AN - SCOPUS:84926260269
SN - 0914-5087
VL - 64
SP - 324
EP - 327
JO - Journal of Cardiography
JF - Journal of Cardiography
IS - 4
ER -