Substituent effect on the rate of the hydroxyl and phenyl radical spin trapping with nitrones

Yoshimi Sueishi, Chiharu Yoshioka, Claudio Olea-Azar, Lester A. Reinke, Yashige Kotake

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)


Hydroxyl and phenyl radical spin trapping rates by α-phenyl-N-t-butylnitrone (PBN, N-benzylidene-t-butylamine N-oxide) and its analogs were determined using a competitive trapping method. Hydroxyl radical was generated from hydrogen peroxide in water using UV photolysis, in the presence of the selected spin trap plus 5,5-dimethyl-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO). Phenyl radical was produced with UV photolysis of tetraphenyllead, and spin trapping was performed in benzene. Spin trapping rate constants were calculated using EPR signal intensity ratios for the DMPO spin adducts vs PBN-type spin adducts. The rate constants were strongly dependent on the kind of substituent in the spin trap; the magnitude of the substituent effect was also dependent on the kind of free radicals trapped, i.e., hydroxyl or phenyl radicals. For example, in phenyl radical trapping, the spin trapping rate in hydroxy-substituted PBNs followed Hammett's equation, while there is no such correlation in hydroxyl radical trapping. Hydroxy-substituted PBNs such as 2-, 3-, and 4-hydroxy-PBNs showed much lower apparent spin trapping rates than that of PBN. The reaction between hydroxyl radical and phenoxyl group is a likely cause.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2043-2047
Number of pages5
JournalBulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - Sept 1 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Substituent effect on the rate of the hydroxyl and phenyl radical spin trapping with nitrones'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this