TY - JOUR
T1 - Tensile bond strength between custom tray and elastomeric impression material
AU - Maruo, Yukinori
AU - Nishigawa, Goro
AU - Oka, Morihiko
AU - Minagi, Shogo
AU - Irie, Masao
AU - Suzuki, Kazuomi
PY - 2007/5
Y1 - 2007/5
N2 - The aim of this study was to investigate how to achieve sufficient and stable adhesive strength between impression material and tray. Impression materials were molded between autopolymerizing resin columns, and tensile strength was measured as a function of these factors: tray storage time (1, 2, 4, 7, and 10 days), adhesive drying time (0, 1, 5, 10, and 15 minutes), and tray surface roughness (air abrasion, bur-produced roughness, and no treatment). Tensile bond strength was not affected by tray storage time throughout the entire evaluation period of 10 days. As for tray adhesive drying time, Reprosil and Exaimplant yielded extremely low values for drying times of 10 minutes or less (P<0.05), while Imprint II and Impregum were not influenced by drying time. Vinyl polysiloxane achieved the highest adhesive strength with bur-produced roughness, which was significantly higher than with air abrasion or no treatment (P<0.05), whereas polyether achieved the lowest value with bur-produced roughness (P<0.05). It was concluded that surface treatment of custom tray should be adapted to the type of impression material used to achieve optimum bond strength.
AB - The aim of this study was to investigate how to achieve sufficient and stable adhesive strength between impression material and tray. Impression materials were molded between autopolymerizing resin columns, and tensile strength was measured as a function of these factors: tray storage time (1, 2, 4, 7, and 10 days), adhesive drying time (0, 1, 5, 10, and 15 minutes), and tray surface roughness (air abrasion, bur-produced roughness, and no treatment). Tensile bond strength was not affected by tray storage time throughout the entire evaluation period of 10 days. As for tray adhesive drying time, Reprosil and Exaimplant yielded extremely low values for drying times of 10 minutes or less (P<0.05), while Imprint II and Impregum were not influenced by drying time. Vinyl polysiloxane achieved the highest adhesive strength with bur-produced roughness, which was significantly higher than with air abrasion or no treatment (P<0.05), whereas polyether achieved the lowest value with bur-produced roughness (P<0.05). It was concluded that surface treatment of custom tray should be adapted to the type of impression material used to achieve optimum bond strength.
KW - Custom tray
KW - Elastomeric impression material
KW - Tensile bond strength
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35548944049&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35548944049&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4012/dmj.26.323
DO - 10.4012/dmj.26.323
M3 - Article
C2 - 17694739
AN - SCOPUS:35548944049
SN - 0287-4547
VL - 26
SP - 323
EP - 328
JO - Dental Materials Journal
JF - Dental Materials Journal
IS - 3
ER -