TY - JOUR
T1 - The Roles of CD8+ and CD4+ Cells in Tumor Rejection
AU - Udono, Heiichiro
AU - Mieno, Masahiro
AU - Shiku, Hiroshi
AU - Nakayama, Eiichi
PY - 1989/7
Y1 - 1989/7
N2 - In vivo administrations of anti‐Lyt‐2.2 (CDS) mAb and anti‐L3T4 (CD4) mAb selectively eliminated CD8+ cells amd CD4+ cells, respectively. The relative potencies of CD8+ cells and CD4+ cells and their roles in primary tumor rejections were studied by investigating the effects of these mAbs on tumor growth. CD8+ cells were themselves fully capable of mediating rejection in 5 different tumor rejection systems: two radiation leukemia virus (RadLV)‐induced leukemias, B6RV2 and BALBRVD, a radiation‐induced leukemia BALBRL♂1, and a plasmacytoma BALBMOPC‐70A in CB6F1 mice, and a Friend virus‐induced leukemia B6FBL‐3 in B6 mice. On the other hand, CD4+ cells were capable of resisting tumor growth of B6FBL‐3, but not of the other four tumors. Furthermore, for efficient rejection of CB6F1UV+˚l sarcoma by CB6F1 mice, synergy of CDS+ and CD4+ cells was necessary. Blocking of UV+˚ 1 rejection was abrogated by delayed administration of anti‐L3T4 (CD4) mAb but not anti‐Lyt‐2.2 (CDS) mAb, indicating the involvement of CD4+ cells in only the initial phase of rejection.
AB - In vivo administrations of anti‐Lyt‐2.2 (CDS) mAb and anti‐L3T4 (CD4) mAb selectively eliminated CD8+ cells amd CD4+ cells, respectively. The relative potencies of CD8+ cells and CD4+ cells and their roles in primary tumor rejections were studied by investigating the effects of these mAbs on tumor growth. CD8+ cells were themselves fully capable of mediating rejection in 5 different tumor rejection systems: two radiation leukemia virus (RadLV)‐induced leukemias, B6RV2 and BALBRVD, a radiation‐induced leukemia BALBRL♂1, and a plasmacytoma BALBMOPC‐70A in CB6F1 mice, and a Friend virus‐induced leukemia B6FBL‐3 in B6 mice. On the other hand, CD4+ cells were capable of resisting tumor growth of B6FBL‐3, but not of the other four tumors. Furthermore, for efficient rejection of CB6F1UV+˚l sarcoma by CB6F1 mice, synergy of CDS+ and CD4+ cells was necessary. Blocking of UV+˚ 1 rejection was abrogated by delayed administration of anti‐L3T4 (CD4) mAb but not anti‐Lyt‐2.2 (CDS) mAb, indicating the involvement of CD4+ cells in only the initial phase of rejection.
KW - Tumor rejection
KW - T‐cell subsets
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024789733&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024789733&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1989.tb01692.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1989.tb01692.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 2571603
AN - SCOPUS:0024789733
SN - 0910-5050
VL - 80
SP - 649
EP - 654
JO - Japanese Journal of Cancer Research
JF - Japanese Journal of Cancer Research
IS - 7
ER -