TY - JOUR
T1 - Transient IR absorption study of charge carriers photogenerated in sulfur-doped TiO2
AU - Takeshita, Kan
AU - Yamakata, Akira
AU - Ishibashi, Taka Aki
AU - Onishi, Hiroshi
AU - Nishijima, Kazumoto
AU - Ohno, Teruhisa
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (417) and Exploratory Research (No. 15655077) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of the Japanese Government, and also Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology by Japan Science and Technology Agency.
PY - 2006/1/25
Y1 - 2006/1/25
N2 - Sulfur-doped TiO2 was prepared by two methods; one was simple oxidation annealing of TiS2, the other was mixing of titanium isopropoxide and thiourea. These two sulfur-doped TiO2 preparations showed fairly different photocatalytic activity under visible light. The dynamics of photogenerated charge carriers were studied by the transient absorption measurement in the region of mid-IR. In both samples, excitation by 532 nm pulse led to photocarrier generation to the same extent. Nevertheless, the reactivity of the photocarriers was totally different. Photogenerated electrons and holes transferred to reactant gas in the latter sample, whereas they did not in the former sample. We attributed the different carrier behavior to the difference in the distribution of S atoms or particle size. These observations can explain the difference in capability of photocatalysis under visible light.
AB - Sulfur-doped TiO2 was prepared by two methods; one was simple oxidation annealing of TiS2, the other was mixing of titanium isopropoxide and thiourea. These two sulfur-doped TiO2 preparations showed fairly different photocatalytic activity under visible light. The dynamics of photogenerated charge carriers were studied by the transient absorption measurement in the region of mid-IR. In both samples, excitation by 532 nm pulse led to photocarrier generation to the same extent. Nevertheless, the reactivity of the photocarriers was totally different. Photogenerated electrons and holes transferred to reactant gas in the latter sample, whereas they did not in the former sample. We attributed the different carrier behavior to the difference in the distribution of S atoms or particle size. These observations can explain the difference in capability of photocatalysis under visible light.
KW - Photogenerated carriers
KW - Sulfur-doped titanium dioxide
KW - Transient IR absorption
KW - Visible-light-response photocatalyst
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30344453400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30344453400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2005.06.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2005.06.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:30344453400
SN - 1010-6030
VL - 177
SP - 269
EP - 275
JO - Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry
JF - Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry
IS - 2-3
ER -