Triangulation scale error caused by the 1894 Shonai earthquake: a possible cause of erroneous interpretation of seismic potential along the Japan Trench

Takeshi Sagiya, Nobuhisa Matta, Yusaku Ohta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Horizontal crustal strain in the Tohoku area during the twentieth century based on triangulation showed N–S extension and E–W contraction was not significant. This feature was one of the reasons why the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake was unexpected for many scientists. The first triangulation conducted in the late nineteenth century used a length scale defined by baseline surveys, direct measurements of short (2–10 km) baselines with steel rods. The Shionohara baseline in the Yamagata prefecture was measured in May–July 1894 and the 1894 Shonai (M7.0) earthquake occurred in its western neighbor 3 months after the measurement. The earthquake possibly elongated the baseline by as large as 5 cm or 10 ppm. However, the original length measured before the earthquake was used for the network adjustment of the entire triangulation network, causing extensive underestimation of the length scale of the network as large as 5–10 ppm in northeast Japan. The scale error effect was comparable to tectonic deformation signal over 100 years. The baseline length was re-surveyed in 2012, 1 year after the Tohoku-oki earthquake, and the result is consistent with the hypothesis of scale bias considering interseismic deformation.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Original languageEnglish
Article number120
JournalEarth, Planets and Space
Volume70
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2018

Keywords

  • Baseline survey
  • Crustal strain
  • GPS
  • Shionohara baseline
  • The 1894 Shonai earthquake
  • The 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake
  • Triangulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Triangulation scale error caused by the 1894 Shonai earthquake: a possible cause of erroneous interpretation of seismic potential along the Japan Trench'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this