TY - JOUR
T1 - Urologic diseases in the emergency department
AU - Tominaga, Yusuke
AU - Katayama, Satoshi
AU - Ando, Eiichi
AU - Takenaka, Tadasu
AU - Kondo, Katsuyoshi
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - (Objectives) This paper aimed to report the clinical statistics on urologic diseases treated in the emergency department (ED). (Patients and methods) We retrospectively evaluated 1,480 patients diagnosed with urologic diseases in the ED between January 2013 and December 2014. We reviewed the patients' sex, age, main complaints, emergency grade, care-seeking process, hospitalization, examination items, and diagnosis. We also reviewed the correct-diagnosis rates of patients who visited the ED for the first time and were followed up at the urology department. (Results) Of the patients, 2.6% were diagnosed as having a urologic disease, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.5:1. The age distribution ranged from 0 to 101 years, with a median age of 53 years. Patients who required hospitalization accounted for 17.8%. The diagnoses were urolithiasis (546 cases), cystitis (220 cases), and pyelonephritis (137 cases), in order of frequency. The correct-diagnosis rates of urolithiasis (91.2%), benign prostatic hyperplasia (75.0%), and pyelonephritis (71.9%) were high. However, those of testicular torsion (0%), urologic neoplasm (26.7%), prostatitis (35.7%), and epididymitis (35.7%) were low. (Conclusion) In the ED, 82.2% of cases of urologic diseases were mild and did not require hospitalization. The correct-diagnosis rate of acute scrotum was low, as it was difficult to diagnose and thus difficult to manage in the ED. Therefore, urologists should cooperate with ED staff and warn them that cases of acute scrotum should be subjected to emergency consultation.
AB - (Objectives) This paper aimed to report the clinical statistics on urologic diseases treated in the emergency department (ED). (Patients and methods) We retrospectively evaluated 1,480 patients diagnosed with urologic diseases in the ED between January 2013 and December 2014. We reviewed the patients' sex, age, main complaints, emergency grade, care-seeking process, hospitalization, examination items, and diagnosis. We also reviewed the correct-diagnosis rates of patients who visited the ED for the first time and were followed up at the urology department. (Results) Of the patients, 2.6% were diagnosed as having a urologic disease, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.5:1. The age distribution ranged from 0 to 101 years, with a median age of 53 years. Patients who required hospitalization accounted for 17.8%. The diagnoses were urolithiasis (546 cases), cystitis (220 cases), and pyelonephritis (137 cases), in order of frequency. The correct-diagnosis rates of urolithiasis (91.2%), benign prostatic hyperplasia (75.0%), and pyelonephritis (71.9%) were high. However, those of testicular torsion (0%), urologic neoplasm (26.7%), prostatitis (35.7%), and epididymitis (35.7%) were low. (Conclusion) In the ED, 82.2% of cases of urologic diseases were mild and did not require hospitalization. The correct-diagnosis rate of acute scrotum was low, as it was difficult to diagnose and thus difficult to manage in the ED. Therefore, urologists should cooperate with ED staff and warn them that cases of acute scrotum should be subjected to emergency consultation.
KW - Clinical statistics
KW - Emergency room
KW - Urologic disease
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035073956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035073956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5980/jpnjurol.107.239
DO - 10.5980/jpnjurol.107.239
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85035073956
SN - 0021-5287
VL - 107
SP - 239
EP - 244
JO - Japanese Journal of Urology
JF - Japanese Journal of Urology
IS - 4
ER -