TY - JOUR
T1 - Value of percutaneous needle biopsy of small renal tumors in patients referred for cryoablation
AU - Iguchi, Toshihiro
AU - Hiraki, Takao
AU - Gobara, Hideo
AU - Fujiwara, Hiroyasu
AU - Sakurai, Jun
AU - Matsui, Yusuke
AU - Araki, Motoo
AU - Nasu, Yasutomo
AU - Kanazawa, Susumu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Society of Medical Innovation and Technology.
PY - 2017/3/4
Y1 - 2017/3/4
N2 - Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the safety and diagnostic yield of needle biopsy of small renal tumors, and the clinical consequences of performing needle biopsy in patients referred for percutaneous cryoablation before their treatment. Material and methods: Biopsy was performed for 120 tumors (mean diameter, 2.2 cm) in 119 patients. All procedures were divided into diagnostic and non-diagnostic biopsies. Various variables were compared between the two groups. All cryoablation procedures were divided into two groups: procedures with or without simultaneous biopsy. The rates of benign or non-diagnostic tumors in each group were compared. Results: After performing 120 initial and eight repeat biopsies, Grade 1 bleedings occurred in 44 cases. Six tumors were non-diagnostic and 114 were pathologically diagnosed. There were no significant variables between the diagnostic and non-diagnostic biopsies. Unnecessary cryoablation was avoided in nine benign lesions by performing biopsy in advance. Cryoablation performed simultaneously with biopsy included significantly more benign or non-diagnostic tumors than cryoablation performed after biopsy (15.2% vs. 1.4%; p =.01). Conclusions: Percutaneous biopsy of small renal tumors referred for cryoablation was a safe procedure with high diagnostic yield. The confirmation of pathological diagnosis prior to cryoablation is necessary because patients with benign tumors can avoid unnecessary treatment.
AB - Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the safety and diagnostic yield of needle biopsy of small renal tumors, and the clinical consequences of performing needle biopsy in patients referred for percutaneous cryoablation before their treatment. Material and methods: Biopsy was performed for 120 tumors (mean diameter, 2.2 cm) in 119 patients. All procedures were divided into diagnostic and non-diagnostic biopsies. Various variables were compared between the two groups. All cryoablation procedures were divided into two groups: procedures with or without simultaneous biopsy. The rates of benign or non-diagnostic tumors in each group were compared. Results: After performing 120 initial and eight repeat biopsies, Grade 1 bleedings occurred in 44 cases. Six tumors were non-diagnostic and 114 were pathologically diagnosed. There were no significant variables between the diagnostic and non-diagnostic biopsies. Unnecessary cryoablation was avoided in nine benign lesions by performing biopsy in advance. Cryoablation performed simultaneously with biopsy included significantly more benign or non-diagnostic tumors than cryoablation performed after biopsy (15.2% vs. 1.4%; p =.01). Conclusions: Percutaneous biopsy of small renal tumors referred for cryoablation was a safe procedure with high diagnostic yield. The confirmation of pathological diagnosis prior to cryoablation is necessary because patients with benign tumors can avoid unnecessary treatment.
KW - Image-guided procedures
KW - interventional radiology
KW - needle interventions
KW - percutaneous biopsy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994187932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994187932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13645706.2016.1249889
DO - 10.1080/13645706.2016.1249889
M3 - Article
C2 - 27750475
AN - SCOPUS:84994187932
SN - 1364-5706
VL - 26
SP - 86
EP - 91
JO - Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies
JF - Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies
IS - 2
ER -