TY - JOUR
T1 - An expanded training program for endosonographers improved self-diagnosed accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of the pancreas
AU - Harada, Ryo
AU - Kato, Hironari
AU - Fushimi, Soichiro
AU - Iwamuro, Masaya
AU - Inoue, Hirofumi
AU - Muro, Shinichiro
AU - Sakakihara, Ichiro
AU - Noma, Yasuhiro
AU - Yamamoto, Naoki
AU - Horiguchi, Shigeru
AU - Tsutsumi, Koichiro
AU - Okada, Hiroyuki
AU - Yamamoto, Kazuhide
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - Objective. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of cytologic adequacy improves the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). However, on-site advice from a cytotechnologist or cytopathologist is not always available during EUS-FNA. To enhance endosonographers' ability to assess the adequacy of EUS-FNA specimens, we designed an intensive, 2-h interactive training program. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of the program. Methods. Four cytological pictures were selected by a trained cytotechnologist and board-certified cytopathologist from each of the seven patients who underwent EUS-FNA for pancreatic mass in Okayama University Hospital. In total, 28 pictures were used in this study. Twenty endosonographers and 14 cytologists with different levels of EUS-FNA experience evaluated cytological pictures independently before and after the training program. Results. Endosonographers' skill in evaluating the adequacy of EUS-FNA specimens was significantly improved after the completion of the training program (p < 0.001). In contrast, almost all cytologists correctly judged the adequacy of the specimens before taking the training program. Conclusions. This intensive, 2-h interactive training program is useful for endosonographers and capable of improving ROSE of EUS-FNA specimens.
AB - Objective. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of cytologic adequacy improves the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). However, on-site advice from a cytotechnologist or cytopathologist is not always available during EUS-FNA. To enhance endosonographers' ability to assess the adequacy of EUS-FNA specimens, we designed an intensive, 2-h interactive training program. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of the program. Methods. Four cytological pictures were selected by a trained cytotechnologist and board-certified cytopathologist from each of the seven patients who underwent EUS-FNA for pancreatic mass in Okayama University Hospital. In total, 28 pictures were used in this study. Twenty endosonographers and 14 cytologists with different levels of EUS-FNA experience evaluated cytological pictures independently before and after the training program. Results. Endosonographers' skill in evaluating the adequacy of EUS-FNA specimens was significantly improved after the completion of the training program (p < 0.001). In contrast, almost all cytologists correctly judged the adequacy of the specimens before taking the training program. Conclusions. This intensive, 2-h interactive training program is useful for endosonographers and capable of improving ROSE of EUS-FNA specimens.
KW - Cytology
KW - EUS-FNA
KW - Endosonographers
KW - Rapid on-site evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906313083&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906313083&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/00365521.2014.915051
DO - 10.3109/00365521.2014.915051
M3 - Article
C2 - 24896656
AN - SCOPUS:84906313083
SN - 0036-5521
VL - 49
SP - 1119
EP - 1123
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 9
ER -