TY - JOUR
T1 - Balloon Valvuloplasty for Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis in an Infant and Children
AU - Saiki, Kuninobu
AU - Kato, Hirohisa
AU - Suzuki, Kazushige
AU - Inoue, Osamu
AU - Toyoda, On
AU - Takagi, Junichi
AU - Sato, Noboru
AU - Ohara, Nobutoshi
AU - Akagi, Teiji
AU - Ishii, Masahiro
AU - Miyake, Takumi
AU - Sugimura, Tetsu
AU - Maeno, Yasuki
AU - Hashino, Kanoko
AU - Fukuda, Tsuyoshi
PY - 1992/8
Y1 - 1992/8
N2 - Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) was performed in 14 patients, including one critically ill infant with congenital valvular aortic stenosis (AS). BAV was effective in 13 patients (except the infant). The peak systolic pressure gradient between the left ventricle (LV) and the ascending aorta decreased from 76.6 ± 21.6 to 29.5 ± 15.3 mmHg (P < 0.001). Follow‐up cardiac catheterization was performed for eight patients between 1 and 3 years (1.6 ± 1.1 years) after BAV. Restenosis was found in only one patient, and the efficacy of BAV continued significantly. Aortic regurgitation developed or increased in severity in 5 of 13 children immediately after BAV. Any other severe complication was not observed. Dilatation by BAV was not sufficient for the infant with critical AS, and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the lateral wall of the LV occurred during the BAV procedure. The infant died 3 days after the procedure due to AMI. It was concluded that the retrograde double balloon technique was superior to the retrograde single balloon technique. In two cases, the single balloon technique was ineffective because it was impossible to fix the balloon at the aortic annulus. However, the double balloon technique was effective in every patient. BAV is effective for AS in children, and an optional repeat trial may enable BAV to be the first choice for AS. Although BAV may be effective for neonates and infants with critical AS as an emergency treatment, much attention must be paid during the procedure.
AB - Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) was performed in 14 patients, including one critically ill infant with congenital valvular aortic stenosis (AS). BAV was effective in 13 patients (except the infant). The peak systolic pressure gradient between the left ventricle (LV) and the ascending aorta decreased from 76.6 ± 21.6 to 29.5 ± 15.3 mmHg (P < 0.001). Follow‐up cardiac catheterization was performed for eight patients between 1 and 3 years (1.6 ± 1.1 years) after BAV. Restenosis was found in only one patient, and the efficacy of BAV continued significantly. Aortic regurgitation developed or increased in severity in 5 of 13 children immediately after BAV. Any other severe complication was not observed. Dilatation by BAV was not sufficient for the infant with critical AS, and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the lateral wall of the LV occurred during the BAV procedure. The infant died 3 days after the procedure due to AMI. It was concluded that the retrograde double balloon technique was superior to the retrograde single balloon technique. In two cases, the single balloon technique was ineffective because it was impossible to fix the balloon at the aortic annulus. However, the double balloon technique was effective in every patient. BAV is effective for AS in children, and an optional repeat trial may enable BAV to be the first choice for AS. Although BAV may be effective for neonates and infants with critical AS as an emergency treatment, much attention must be paid during the procedure.
KW - Balloon aortic valvuloplasty
KW - Congenital aortic valve stenosis
KW - Critical aortic valve stenosis
KW - Interventional cardiology
KW - Surgical valvotomy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026757854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026757854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1442-200X.1992.tb00983.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1442-200X.1992.tb00983.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 1414333
AN - SCOPUS:0026757854
SN - 1328-8067
VL - 34
SP - 433
EP - 440
JO - Pediatrics International
JF - Pediatrics International
IS - 4
ER -