TY - JOUR
T1 - Catalog of prognostic tissue-based biomarkers in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder
T2 - a systematic review
AU - European Association of Urology—Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU): Urothelial carcinoma working group
AU - Laukhtina, Ekaterina
AU - Pradere, Benjamin
AU - Mori, Keiichiro
AU - Schuettfort, Victor M.
AU - Quhal, Fahad
AU - Mostafaei, Hadi
AU - Sari Motlangh, Reza
AU - Katayama, Satoshi
AU - Grossmann, Nico C.
AU - Moschini, Marco
AU - Enikeev, Dmitry
AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F.
N1 - Funding Information:
Ekaterina Laukhtina and Victor M. Schuettfort are supported by the EUSP Scholarship of the European Association of Urology (EAU). Nico C. Grossmann is supported by the Zurich Cancer League.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - PURPOSE: The present systematic review aimed to identify prognostic values of tissue-based biomarkers in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST), including chemotherapy (NAC) and checkpoint inhibitors (NAI) for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched in August 2020 according to the PRISMA statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared oncologic or pathologic outcomes in patients treated with NAST for UCB with and without detected pretreatment tissue-based biomarkers. RESULTS: Overall, 44 studies met our eligibility criteria. Twenty-three studies used immunohistochemistry (IHC), 19 – gene expression analysis, three - quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QT PCR), and two – next-generation sequencing (NGS). According to the currently available literature, predictive IHC-assessed biomarkers, such as receptor tyrosine kinases and DNA repair pathway alterations, do not seem to convincingly improve our prediction of pathologic response and oncologic outcomes after NAC. Luminal and basal tumor subtypes based on gene expression analysis showed better NAC response, while claudin-low and luminal-infiltrated tumor subtypes did not. In terms of NAI, PD-L1 seems to maintain value as a predictive biomarker, while the utility of both tumor mutational burden and molecular subtypes remains controversial. Specific genomic alterations in DNA repair genes have been shown to provide significant predictive value in patient treated with NAC. QT PCR quantification of specific genes selected through microarray analysis seems to classify cases regarding their NAC response. CONCLUSION: We believe that the present systematic review may offer a robust framework that will enable the testing and validation of predictive biomarkers in future prospective clinical trials. NGS has expanded the discovery of molecular markers that are reflective of the mechanisms of the NAST response.
AB - PURPOSE: The present systematic review aimed to identify prognostic values of tissue-based biomarkers in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST), including chemotherapy (NAC) and checkpoint inhibitors (NAI) for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched in August 2020 according to the PRISMA statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared oncologic or pathologic outcomes in patients treated with NAST for UCB with and without detected pretreatment tissue-based biomarkers. RESULTS: Overall, 44 studies met our eligibility criteria. Twenty-three studies used immunohistochemistry (IHC), 19 – gene expression analysis, three - quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QT PCR), and two – next-generation sequencing (NGS). According to the currently available literature, predictive IHC-assessed biomarkers, such as receptor tyrosine kinases and DNA repair pathway alterations, do not seem to convincingly improve our prediction of pathologic response and oncologic outcomes after NAC. Luminal and basal tumor subtypes based on gene expression analysis showed better NAC response, while claudin-low and luminal-infiltrated tumor subtypes did not. In terms of NAI, PD-L1 seems to maintain value as a predictive biomarker, while the utility of both tumor mutational burden and molecular subtypes remains controversial. Specific genomic alterations in DNA repair genes have been shown to provide significant predictive value in patient treated with NAC. QT PCR quantification of specific genes selected through microarray analysis seems to classify cases regarding their NAC response. CONCLUSION: We believe that the present systematic review may offer a robust framework that will enable the testing and validation of predictive biomarkers in future prospective clinical trials. NGS has expanded the discovery of molecular markers that are reflective of the mechanisms of the NAST response.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - bladder cancer
KW - NAC
KW - Neoadjuvant systemic therapy
KW - systematic review
KW - UCB
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099121705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099121705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.12.019
DO - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.12.019
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33423937
AN - SCOPUS:85099121705
SN - 1078-1439
VL - 39
SP - 180
EP - 190
JO - Seminars in Urology
JF - Seminars in Urology
IS - 3
ER -