TY - JOUR
T1 - Complementary roles of pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in diagnosis and prognosis of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)
AU - Shibayama, Takuo
AU - Ueoka, Hiroshi
AU - Nishii, Kenji
AU - Kiura, Katsuyuki
AU - Tabata, Masahiro
AU - Miyatake, Kazuyo
AU - Kitajima, Takuji
AU - Harada, Mine
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - In this study, we evaluated the clinical usefulness of ProGRP and NSE for diagnosis and prognosis of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Serum levels of ProGRP and NSE were determined in 108 healthy subjects, 103 patients with benign pulmonary diseases, 142 with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and 114 with SCLC. Sensitivity of ProGRP in diagnosis of SCLC was significantly higher than that of NSE (64.9 vs. 43.0%, P<0.001). The difference was substantial in patients with limited disease (56.5 vs. 20.3%, P<0.001). However, 11 of 40 SCLC patients with normal levels of serum ProGRP (27.5%) showed elevated levels of serum NSE. In the SCLC patients receiving chemotherapy, the CR rate in patients with elevated NSE levels was significantly lower than in patients with normal levels of NSE (18.5 vs. 61.7%, P<0.001). Elevation of both ProGRP and NSE was a poor prognostic factor, and patients with elevated levels of either ProGRP or NSE showed shorter survival than those without. From multivariate analysis, NSE was found to have a greater effect on survival of SCLC patients than ProGRP. These findings indicate that ProGRP is more sensitive than NSE for diagnosis of SCLC, while NSE is superior to ProGRP as a prognostic factor. In conclusion, both ProGRP and NSE are useful tumor markers and they have a complementary role for each other in diagnosis and prognosis of SCLC.
AB - In this study, we evaluated the clinical usefulness of ProGRP and NSE for diagnosis and prognosis of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Serum levels of ProGRP and NSE were determined in 108 healthy subjects, 103 patients with benign pulmonary diseases, 142 with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and 114 with SCLC. Sensitivity of ProGRP in diagnosis of SCLC was significantly higher than that of NSE (64.9 vs. 43.0%, P<0.001). The difference was substantial in patients with limited disease (56.5 vs. 20.3%, P<0.001). However, 11 of 40 SCLC patients with normal levels of serum ProGRP (27.5%) showed elevated levels of serum NSE. In the SCLC patients receiving chemotherapy, the CR rate in patients with elevated NSE levels was significantly lower than in patients with normal levels of NSE (18.5 vs. 61.7%, P<0.001). Elevation of both ProGRP and NSE was a poor prognostic factor, and patients with elevated levels of either ProGRP or NSE showed shorter survival than those without. From multivariate analysis, NSE was found to have a greater effect on survival of SCLC patients than ProGRP. These findings indicate that ProGRP is more sensitive than NSE for diagnosis of SCLC, while NSE is superior to ProGRP as a prognostic factor. In conclusion, both ProGRP and NSE are useful tumor markers and they have a complementary role for each other in diagnosis and prognosis of SCLC.
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Neuron specific enolase (NSE)
KW - Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP)
KW - Prognostic factor
KW - Small-cell lung cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035103446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035103446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0169-5002(00)00205-1
DO - 10.1016/S0169-5002(00)00205-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 11282430
AN - SCOPUS:0035103446
SN - 0169-5002
VL - 32
SP - 61
EP - 69
JO - Lung Cancer
JF - Lung Cancer
IS - 1
ER -