TY - JOUR
T1 - Compositional epistasis
T2 - An epidemiologic perspective
AU - Suzuki, Etsuji
AU - Vanderweele, Tyler J.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Under Bateson’s original conception, the term “epistasis” is used to describe the situation in which the effect of a genetic factor at one locus is masked by a variant at another locus. Epistasis in the sense of masking has been termed “compositional epistasis.” In general, statistical tests for interaction are of limited use in detecting compositional epistasis. Using recently developed epidemiological methods, however, it has been shown that there are relations between empirical data patterns and compositional epistasis. These relations can sometimes be exploited to empirically test for certain forms of compositional epistasis, by using alternative nonstandard tests for interaction.Using the counterfactual framework, we show conditions that can be empirically tested to determine whether there are individuals whose phenotype response patterns manifest epistasis in the sense of masking. Only under some very strong assumptions would tests for standard statistical interactions correspond to compositional epistasis. Even without such strong assumptions, however, one can still test whether there are individuals of phenotype response type representing compositional epistasis. The empirical conditions are quite strong, but the conclusions which tests of these conditions allow may be of interest in a wide range of studies. This chapter highlights that epidemiologic perspectives can be used to shed light on underlying mechanisms at the genetic, molecular, and cellular levels.
AB - Under Bateson’s original conception, the term “epistasis” is used to describe the situation in which the effect of a genetic factor at one locus is masked by a variant at another locus. Epistasis in the sense of masking has been termed “compositional epistasis.” In general, statistical tests for interaction are of limited use in detecting compositional epistasis. Using recently developed epidemiological methods, however, it has been shown that there are relations between empirical data patterns and compositional epistasis. These relations can sometimes be exploited to empirically test for certain forms of compositional epistasis, by using alternative nonstandard tests for interaction.Using the counterfactual framework, we show conditions that can be empirically tested to determine whether there are individuals whose phenotype response patterns manifest epistasis in the sense of masking. Only under some very strong assumptions would tests for standard statistical interactions correspond to compositional epistasis. Even without such strong assumptions, however, one can still test whether there are individuals of phenotype response type representing compositional epistasis. The empirical conditions are quite strong, but the conclusions which tests of these conditions allow may be of interest in a wide range of studies. This chapter highlights that epidemiologic perspectives can be used to shed light on underlying mechanisms at the genetic, molecular, and cellular levels.
KW - Causality
KW - Compositional epistasis
KW - Counterfactual
KW - Epidemiologic methods
KW - Mechanistic interaction
KW - Monotonicity assumptions
KW - Potential outcomes
KW - Statistical epistasis
KW - Statistical models
KW - Sufficient-cause framework
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955101870&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955101870&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4939-2155-3_11
DO - 10.1007/978-1-4939-2155-3_11
M3 - Article
C2 - 25403534
AN - SCOPUS:84955101870
SN - 1064-3745
VL - 1253
SP - 197
EP - 216
JO - Methods in Molecular Biology
JF - Methods in Molecular Biology
ER -