TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for submucosal palatal tumors
AU - Matsuzaki, Hidenobu
AU - Yanagi, Yoshinobu
AU - Hara, Marina
AU - Katase, Naoki
AU - Hisatomi, Miki
AU - Unetsubo, Teruhisa
AU - Konouchi, Hironobu
AU - Takenobu, Toshihiko
AU - Nagatsuka, Hitoshi
AU - Asaumi, Jun Ichi
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/11
Y1 - 2012/11
N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for differentiating between benign and malignant tumors in the palate. Materials and methods: 26 patients with submucosal palatal tumors were preoperatively examined using DCE-MRI. Their maximum contrast index (CImax), time of CImax (Tmax), and washout ratios (WR300 and WR600) were determined from contrast index curves. The submucosal palatal tumors were divided into two groups according to their Tmax values: the early enhancement group (Tmax < 300 s) consisted of 9 malignant tumors and 6 benign tumors, while the late enhancement group (Tmax ≥ 300 s) included one malignant tumor and 10 benign tumors. We compared the following DCE-MRI parameters between the benign and malignant tumors: CImax and Tmax in all cases and CImax, Tmax, and the washout ratios in the early enhancement group. In addition, we performed a regression analysis of the relationships between tumor size and DCE-MRI parameters; i.e., CImax, Tmax, and washout ratios, among the malignant salivary gland tumors and pleomorphic adenomas. Results: In all cases and the early enhancement group, significant differences in Tmax were detected between the benign and malignant tumors (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively), and the optimal Tmax cutoff value for differentiating between them was found to be 165 s. None of the other parameters displayed significant differences between the benign and malignant tumors. Only the WR600 of the pleomorphic adenomas was significantly correlated with tumor size (R2 = 0.92, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Tmax is a useful parameter for distinguishing between benign and malignant submucosal palatal tumors.
AB - Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for differentiating between benign and malignant tumors in the palate. Materials and methods: 26 patients with submucosal palatal tumors were preoperatively examined using DCE-MRI. Their maximum contrast index (CImax), time of CImax (Tmax), and washout ratios (WR300 and WR600) were determined from contrast index curves. The submucosal palatal tumors were divided into two groups according to their Tmax values: the early enhancement group (Tmax < 300 s) consisted of 9 malignant tumors and 6 benign tumors, while the late enhancement group (Tmax ≥ 300 s) included one malignant tumor and 10 benign tumors. We compared the following DCE-MRI parameters between the benign and malignant tumors: CImax and Tmax in all cases and CImax, Tmax, and the washout ratios in the early enhancement group. In addition, we performed a regression analysis of the relationships between tumor size and DCE-MRI parameters; i.e., CImax, Tmax, and washout ratios, among the malignant salivary gland tumors and pleomorphic adenomas. Results: In all cases and the early enhancement group, significant differences in Tmax were detected between the benign and malignant tumors (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively), and the optimal Tmax cutoff value for differentiating between them was found to be 165 s. None of the other parameters displayed significant differences between the benign and malignant tumors. Only the WR600 of the pleomorphic adenomas was significantly correlated with tumor size (R2 = 0.92, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Tmax is a useful parameter for distinguishing between benign and malignant submucosal palatal tumors.
KW - Dynamic MRI
KW - MRI
KW - Malignant lymphoma
KW - Minor salivary gland tumor
KW - Palate tumor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867028749&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867028749&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.009
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 22578835
AN - SCOPUS:84867028749
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 81
SP - 3306
EP - 3312
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
IS - 11
ER -