TY - JOUR
T1 - Discontinuation of Immune-oncology Combinations due to Immune-related Adverse Events in Patients With Advanced Renal Cancers
AU - Bekku, Kensuke
AU - Schmidinger, Manuela
AU - Katayama, Satoshi
AU - Kawada, Tatsushi
AU - Yanagisawa, Takafumi
AU - Iwata, Takehiro
AU - Edamura, Kohei
AU - Kobayashi, Tomoko
AU - Kobayashi, Yasuyuki
AU - Araki, Motoo
AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Background/Aim: Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) treated with immune-oncology (IO) drugs may need to discontinue the treatment when severe immune-related adverse events (irAE) occur; however, the impact of discontinuation on survival remains unknown. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter analysis using a database of 183 aRCC patients treated with first-line IO drugs combination. The patients were divided into two groups according to the necessity of discontinuation due to irAEs. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazard models determined the predictive factors on OS. Results: Among a total of 135 patients who experienced irAE, 38 patients had to discontinue and 52 continued the treatment while treating irAE. When compared to patients who were able to continue treatment, discontinuation was associated with significantly higher rates of IO-IO doublet use, severe irAE (grade ≥3), steroid use, and the occurrence of immune-related pneumonitis (p=0.03, p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.02, respectively). The objective response rates were comparable between the two groups (discontinuation 55.6% vs. no discontinuation 56.0%, p=0.7). On univariate analysis, patients who discontinued had a significantly worse OS when compared to those who continued treatment (p=0.02).
AB - Background/Aim: Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) treated with immune-oncology (IO) drugs may need to discontinue the treatment when severe immune-related adverse events (irAE) occur; however, the impact of discontinuation on survival remains unknown. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter analysis using a database of 183 aRCC patients treated with first-line IO drugs combination. The patients were divided into two groups according to the necessity of discontinuation due to irAEs. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazard models determined the predictive factors on OS. Results: Among a total of 135 patients who experienced irAE, 38 patients had to discontinue and 52 continued the treatment while treating irAE. When compared to patients who were able to continue treatment, discontinuation was associated with significantly higher rates of IO-IO doublet use, severe irAE (grade ≥3), steroid use, and the occurrence of immune-related pneumonitis (p=0.03, p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.02, respectively). The objective response rates were comparable between the two groups (discontinuation 55.6% vs. no discontinuation 56.0%, p=0.7). On univariate analysis, patients who discontinued had a significantly worse OS when compared to those who continued treatment (p=0.02).
KW - Renal cell carcinoma
KW - discontinuation
KW - immune-oncology drug
KW - immune-related adverse event
KW - retreatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181547680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85181547680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21873/anticanres.16822
DO - 10.21873/anticanres.16822
M3 - Article
C2 - 38160006
AN - SCOPUS:85181547680
SN - 0250-7005
VL - 44
SP - 379
EP - 386
JO - Anticancer research
JF - Anticancer research
IS - 1
ER -