TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of difference in fixation methods of tendon graft and the microfracture procedure on tendon-bone junction healing
AU - Nezu, Satoshi
AU - Saito, Taichi
AU - Yoshida, Aki
AU - Narazaki, Shinji
AU - Shimamura, Yasunori
AU - Furumatsu, Takayuki
AU - Ozaki, Toshifumi
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background: There are generally two methods of fixation for tendon grafts used in ligament reconstruction: bone tunnel fixation and anchor fixation. The microfracture (Mf) procedure is a technique to induce bleeding from the bone marrow, and the bleeding may contain cells with differentiation potential. However, few studies have compared the effects of the Mf procedure with those of the fixation methods. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Mf procedure on two tendon graft fixation methods: histological, gene expression, tendon graft thickness, and mechanical. We especially focused our investigation on junction healing of tendon grafts and bone in the two fixation methods. Methods: We used 20 rabbits to evaluate tendon and bone healing in a peroneal tendon graft model. The rabbit models were divided into five groups according to the combination of peroneal tendon graft fixation method and Mf technique as follows: control group (C, n = 4), bone tunnel fixation without Mf procedure group (BT − Mf, n = 4), bone tunnel fixation with Mf procedure group (BT + Mf, n = 4), anchor fixation without Mf procedure group (A − Mf, n = 4), and anchor fixation with Mf procedure group (A + Mf, n = 4). All animals were sacrificed at 4 weeks postoperatively. The specimens underwent histological evaluation, mRNA analysis, tendon graft thickness at the tendon-bone junction, and biomechanical testing. Results: Histological evaluation of the BT + Mf and A + Mf groups showed healing with fibrocartilage formation at the tendon graft-bone junction. The mRNA expression showed significant increase in type 2 collagen, Scleraxis, and SRY-box9 in the BT + Mf and A + Mf groups. In biomechanical tests, the BT + Mf and A + Mf groups showed significantly increased tensile strength compared with the BT − Mf and A − Mf groups (BT + Mf group, 21.6 ± 1.7 N; A + Mf group, 22.5 ± 2.3 N vs. BT − Mf group, 12.3 ± 2.4 N; A − Mf group, 11 ± 2.3 N). Conclusion: The Mf procedure resulted in fibrocartilage formation at the tendon-bone junction in the BT and anchor fixation and improved the fixation strength at 4 weeks.
AB - Background: There are generally two methods of fixation for tendon grafts used in ligament reconstruction: bone tunnel fixation and anchor fixation. The microfracture (Mf) procedure is a technique to induce bleeding from the bone marrow, and the bleeding may contain cells with differentiation potential. However, few studies have compared the effects of the Mf procedure with those of the fixation methods. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Mf procedure on two tendon graft fixation methods: histological, gene expression, tendon graft thickness, and mechanical. We especially focused our investigation on junction healing of tendon grafts and bone in the two fixation methods. Methods: We used 20 rabbits to evaluate tendon and bone healing in a peroneal tendon graft model. The rabbit models were divided into five groups according to the combination of peroneal tendon graft fixation method and Mf technique as follows: control group (C, n = 4), bone tunnel fixation without Mf procedure group (BT − Mf, n = 4), bone tunnel fixation with Mf procedure group (BT + Mf, n = 4), anchor fixation without Mf procedure group (A − Mf, n = 4), and anchor fixation with Mf procedure group (A + Mf, n = 4). All animals were sacrificed at 4 weeks postoperatively. The specimens underwent histological evaluation, mRNA analysis, tendon graft thickness at the tendon-bone junction, and biomechanical testing. Results: Histological evaluation of the BT + Mf and A + Mf groups showed healing with fibrocartilage formation at the tendon graft-bone junction. The mRNA expression showed significant increase in type 2 collagen, Scleraxis, and SRY-box9 in the BT + Mf and A + Mf groups. In biomechanical tests, the BT + Mf and A + Mf groups showed significantly increased tensile strength compared with the BT − Mf and A − Mf groups (BT + Mf group, 21.6 ± 1.7 N; A + Mf group, 22.5 ± 2.3 N vs. BT − Mf group, 12.3 ± 2.4 N; A − Mf group, 11 ± 2.3 N). Conclusion: The Mf procedure resulted in fibrocartilage formation at the tendon-bone junction in the BT and anchor fixation and improved the fixation strength at 4 weeks.
KW - Anchor fixation
KW - Basic Science Study
KW - Biomechanics
KW - Bone marrow bleeding
KW - Bone tunnel fixation
KW - Enthesis reconstruction
KW - Histology
KW - Microfracture procedure
KW - Molecular Biology
KW - Tendon graft
KW - Tendon-bone junction healing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122508694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122508694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.10.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.10.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122508694
SN - 2468-6026
VL - 6
SP - 155
EP - 166
JO - JSES International
JF - JSES International
IS - 1
ER -