TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of coronary artery calcification in the donor heart on transmitted coronary artery disease in heart transplant recipients
AU - Kimura, Yuki
AU - Seguchi, Osamu
AU - Iwasaki, Keiichiro
AU - Toda, Koichi
AU - Kikuchi, Noriko
AU - Matsuda, Sachi
AU - Kumai, Yuto
AU - Kuroda, Kensuke
AU - Wada, Kyoichi
AU - Matsumoto, Yorihiko
AU - Fukushima, Satsuki
AU - Yanase, Masanobu
AU - Fujita, Tomoyuki
AU - Kobayashi, Junjiro
AU - Fukushima, Norihide
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Japanese Circulation Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) after heart transplantation (HTx) develops as a combination of donor-transmitted coronary atherosclerosis (DTCA) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Assessing donor CAD before procurement is important. Because coronary artery calcification (CAC) is a predictor for CAD, donor-heart CAC is usually evaluated to estimate the risk of donor CAD. The usefulness of CAC for predicting DTCA, however, is not known. Methods and Results: Sixty-four HTx recipients whose donor underwent chest computed tomography before procurement or ≤2 weeks after HTx and who underwent coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) ≤3 months after HTx were enrolled. Eight patients had CAC (CAC group) and 56 patients did not have CAC (no-CAC group). Patients in the CAC group were significantly older and had a higher prevalence of maximum intimal thickness (MIT) of the coronary artery ≥0.5 mm at initial IVUS than patients in the no-CAC group (100% vs. 55%, P=0.02). Adverse cardiac events and death were not significantly different. Everolimus tended to be used more often in the CAC group. Conclusions: Donor-heart CAC is a significant predictor for MIT of the coronary artery ≥0.5 mm after HTx. The presence of CAC, however, is not associated with future cardiac events. The higher prevalence of everolimus use in the CAC group may have affected the results.
AB - Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) after heart transplantation (HTx) develops as a combination of donor-transmitted coronary atherosclerosis (DTCA) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Assessing donor CAD before procurement is important. Because coronary artery calcification (CAC) is a predictor for CAD, donor-heart CAC is usually evaluated to estimate the risk of donor CAD. The usefulness of CAC for predicting DTCA, however, is not known. Methods and Results: Sixty-four HTx recipients whose donor underwent chest computed tomography before procurement or ≤2 weeks after HTx and who underwent coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) ≤3 months after HTx were enrolled. Eight patients had CAC (CAC group) and 56 patients did not have CAC (no-CAC group). Patients in the CAC group were significantly older and had a higher prevalence of maximum intimal thickness (MIT) of the coronary artery ≥0.5 mm at initial IVUS than patients in the no-CAC group (100% vs. 55%, P=0.02). Adverse cardiac events and death were not significantly different. Everolimus tended to be used more often in the CAC group. Conclusions: Donor-heart CAC is a significant predictor for MIT of the coronary artery ≥0.5 mm after HTx. The presence of CAC, however, is not associated with future cardiac events. The higher prevalence of everolimus use in the CAC group may have affected the results.
KW - Cardiac allograft vasculopathy
KW - Coronary artery calcification
KW - Donor-transmitted coronary artery disease
KW - Heart transplantation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057094120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057094120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0107
DO - 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0107
M3 - Article
C2 - 30270311
AN - SCOPUS:85057094120
SN - 1346-9843
VL - 82
SP - 3021
EP - 3028
JO - Circulation Journal
JF - Circulation Journal
IS - 12
ER -