TY - JOUR
T1 - Review of the Isua supracrustal belt area (Greenland) Eoarchean geology from integrated 1:20,000 scale maps, field observations and laboratory data
T2 - Constraints on early geodynamics
AU - Nutman, Allen P.
AU - Friend, Clark R.L.
AU - Bennett, Vickie C.
AU - Yi, Keewook
AU - Van Kranendonk, Martin
N1 - Funding Information:
Current work on the Isua supracrustal belt by is supported by Australian Research Council Discovery Grants DP170100715 for A. Nutman, V. Bennett and C.R.L. Friend and DP180100103 for these authors and M. Van Kranendonk. The first three authors also gratefully acknowledge previous support from the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, The Australian National University, The Royal Society, The Carlsberg Fund, the National Environmental Research Council (U.K.) and Nunaminerals A/S. We also thank Shane Paxton (ANU) for the large number of zircon separations he performed on our behalf, particularly for extracting small numbers of zircons from rocks such as Isua banded iron formations. K. Yi acknowledges support from the Korea Basic Science Institute and the Korean Polar Research Institute. M. Van Kranendonk is also supported by Australian research Discovery Project DP180103204. The authors thank Adam Garde and an anonymous reviewer for their improvements to the original manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - In the early 1970s, Vic McGregor and Stephen Moorbath demonstrated that the Isua supracrustal belt (Greenland) and its surrounding orthogneisses formed in the Eoarchean (Moorbath et al., 1972, 1973). Fifty years later, these rocks are a key resource globally for understanding the Eoarchean Earth. This is because there is an extensive area (∼200 km2) of abundant outcrops where superimposed Neoarchean strain is modest, and Neoarchean metamorphism was only at lowest amphibolite facies; these are low tectonothermal conditions compared with other Eoarchean crustal remnants globally. Therefore, this region can provide the clearest window onto early Earth geodynamics. Within the Isua supracrustal belt there are rare areas where Eoarchean strain is also low, and these areas provide unambiguous recognition of diverse lithologies including sedimentary carbonates with the oldest proposed but contested stromatolites, pillow lavas, volcano-sedimentary lithologies and ultramafic rocks derived from layered intrusions (accepted) and slivers of mantle-derived meta-serpentinite that underwent Eoarchean ultra-high-pressure metamorphism (contested). As explored in previous papers (e.g., Polat et al., 2002), the geochemical signatures of the mafic igneous rocks, which include a boninite-like suite, indicate their magmas were derived by fluid fluxing of peridotites. Radiogenic isotopic signatures define discrete pulses of Eoarchean juvenile crustal growth, until a tectonic event at ∼3660 Ma with high pressure metamorphism that was followed by a switch to crustal recycling with the production of granites sensu stricto. Our appraisal of the integrated evidence points to complex superimposed Eoarchean events (∼3820–3600 Ma) driven by lateral lithosphere movements in convergent boundary settings, rather than a single crustal overturn such as within a model heat-pipe scenario.
AB - In the early 1970s, Vic McGregor and Stephen Moorbath demonstrated that the Isua supracrustal belt (Greenland) and its surrounding orthogneisses formed in the Eoarchean (Moorbath et al., 1972, 1973). Fifty years later, these rocks are a key resource globally for understanding the Eoarchean Earth. This is because there is an extensive area (∼200 km2) of abundant outcrops where superimposed Neoarchean strain is modest, and Neoarchean metamorphism was only at lowest amphibolite facies; these are low tectonothermal conditions compared with other Eoarchean crustal remnants globally. Therefore, this region can provide the clearest window onto early Earth geodynamics. Within the Isua supracrustal belt there are rare areas where Eoarchean strain is also low, and these areas provide unambiguous recognition of diverse lithologies including sedimentary carbonates with the oldest proposed but contested stromatolites, pillow lavas, volcano-sedimentary lithologies and ultramafic rocks derived from layered intrusions (accepted) and slivers of mantle-derived meta-serpentinite that underwent Eoarchean ultra-high-pressure metamorphism (contested). As explored in previous papers (e.g., Polat et al., 2002), the geochemical signatures of the mafic igneous rocks, which include a boninite-like suite, indicate their magmas were derived by fluid fluxing of peridotites. Radiogenic isotopic signatures define discrete pulses of Eoarchean juvenile crustal growth, until a tectonic event at ∼3660 Ma with high pressure metamorphism that was followed by a switch to crustal recycling with the production of granites sensu stricto. Our appraisal of the integrated evidence points to complex superimposed Eoarchean events (∼3820–3600 Ma) driven by lateral lithosphere movements in convergent boundary settings, rather than a single crustal overturn such as within a model heat-pipe scenario.
KW - Crustal evolution
KW - Eoarchean
KW - Isua supracrustal belt
KW - Plate tectonics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135707369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135707369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.precamres.2022.106785
DO - 10.1016/j.precamres.2022.106785
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85135707369
SN - 0301-9268
VL - 379
JO - Precambrian Research
JF - Precambrian Research
M1 - 106785
ER -