TY - JOUR
T1 - Robotic systems in interventional oncology
T2 - a narrative review of the current status
AU - Matsui, Yusuke
AU - Kamegawa, Tetsushi
AU - Tomita, Koji
AU - Uka, Mayu
AU - Umakoshi, Noriyuki
AU - Kawabata, Takahiro
AU - Munetomo, Kazuaki
AU - Iguchi, Toshihiro
AU - Matsuno, Takayuki
AU - Hiraki, Takao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - Interventional oncology offers minimally invasive treatments for malignant tumors for curative and palliative purposes based on the percutaneous insertion of needles or catheters into the target location under image guidance. Robotic systems have been gaining increasing attention as tools that provide potential advantages for image-guided interventions. Among the robotic systems developed for intervention, those relevant to the oncology field are mainly those for guiding or driving the needles in non-vascular interventional procedures such as biopsy and tumor ablation. Needle-guiding robots support planning the needle path and align the needle robotically according to the planned trajectory, which is combined with subsequent manual needle insertion by the physician through the needle guide. Needle-driving robots can advance the needle robotically after determining its orientation. Although a wide variety of robotic systems have been developed, only a limited number of these systems have reached the clinical phase or commercialization thus far. The results of previous studies suggest that such interventional robots have the potential to increase the accuracy of needle placement, facilitate out-of-plane needle insertion, decrease the learning curve, and reduce radiation exposure. On the other hand, increased complexity and costs may be a concern when using robotic systems compared with conventional manual procedures. Further data should be collected to comprehensively assess the value of robotic systems in interventional oncology.
AB - Interventional oncology offers minimally invasive treatments for malignant tumors for curative and palliative purposes based on the percutaneous insertion of needles or catheters into the target location under image guidance. Robotic systems have been gaining increasing attention as tools that provide potential advantages for image-guided interventions. Among the robotic systems developed for intervention, those relevant to the oncology field are mainly those for guiding or driving the needles in non-vascular interventional procedures such as biopsy and tumor ablation. Needle-guiding robots support planning the needle path and align the needle robotically according to the planned trajectory, which is combined with subsequent manual needle insertion by the physician through the needle guide. Needle-driving robots can advance the needle robotically after determining its orientation. Although a wide variety of robotic systems have been developed, only a limited number of these systems have reached the clinical phase or commercialization thus far. The results of previous studies suggest that such interventional robots have the potential to increase the accuracy of needle placement, facilitate out-of-plane needle insertion, decrease the learning curve, and reduce radiation exposure. On the other hand, increased complexity and costs may be a concern when using robotic systems compared with conventional manual procedures. Further data should be collected to comprehensively assess the value of robotic systems in interventional oncology.
KW - Ablation
KW - Biopsy
KW - Interventional oncology
KW - Interventional radiology
KW - Needle
KW - Robot
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85153739806
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85153739806#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/s10147-023-02344-8
DO - 10.1007/s10147-023-02344-8
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37115426
AN - SCOPUS:85153739806
SN - 1341-9625
VL - 29
SP - 81
EP - 88
JO - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 2
ER -