TY - JOUR
T1 - Three-dimensional conformal setup (3D-CSU) of patients using the coordinate system provided by three internal fiducial markers and two orthogonal diagnostic X-ray systems in the treatment room
AU - Shirato, Hiroki
AU - Oita, Masataka
AU - Fujita, Katsuhisa
AU - Shimizu, Shinichi
AU - Onimaru, Rikiya
AU - Uegaki, Shinji
AU - Watanabe, Yoshiharu
AU - Kato, Norio
AU - Miyasaka, Kazuo
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
PY - 2004/10/1
Y1 - 2004/10/1
N2 - To test the accuracy of a system for correcting for the rotational error of the clinical target volume (CTV) without having to reposition the patient using three fiducial markers and two orthogonal fluoroscopic images. We call this system "three-dimensional conformal setup" (3D-CSU). Three 2.0-mm gold markers are inserted into or adjacent to the CTV. On the treatment couch, the actual positions of the three markers are calculated based on two orthogonal fluoroscopies crossing at the isocenter of the linear accelerator. Discrepancy of the actual coordinates of gravity center of three markers from its planned coordinates is calculated. Translational setup error is corrected by adjustment of the treatment couch. The rotation angles (α, β, γ) of the coordinates of the actual CTV relative to the planned CTV are calculated around the lateral (x), craniocaudal (y), and anteroposterior (z) axes of the planned CTV. The angles of the gantry head, collimator, and treatment couch of the linear accelerator are adjusted according to the rotation of the actual coordinates of the tumor in relation to the planned coordinates. We have measured the accuracy of 3D-CSU using a static cubic phantom. The gravity center of the phantom was corrected within 0.9 ± 0.3 mm (mean ± SD), 0.4 ± 0.2 mm, and 0.6 ± 0.2 mm for the rotation of the phantom from 0-30 degrees around the x, y, and z axes, respectively, every 5 degrees. Dose distribution was shown to be consistent with the planned dose distribution every 10 degrees of the rotation from 0-30 degrees. The mean rotational error after 3D-CSU was -0.4 ± 0.4 (mean ± SD), -0.2 ± 0.4, and 0.0 ± 0.5 degrees around the x, y, and z axis, respectively, for the rotation from 0-90 degrees. Phantom studies showed that 3D-CSU is useful for performing rotational correction of the target volume without correcting the position of the patient on the treatment couch. The 3D-CSU will be clinically useful for tumors in structures such as paraspinal diseases and prostate cancers not subject to large internal organ motion.
AB - To test the accuracy of a system for correcting for the rotational error of the clinical target volume (CTV) without having to reposition the patient using three fiducial markers and two orthogonal fluoroscopic images. We call this system "three-dimensional conformal setup" (3D-CSU). Three 2.0-mm gold markers are inserted into or adjacent to the CTV. On the treatment couch, the actual positions of the three markers are calculated based on two orthogonal fluoroscopies crossing at the isocenter of the linear accelerator. Discrepancy of the actual coordinates of gravity center of three markers from its planned coordinates is calculated. Translational setup error is corrected by adjustment of the treatment couch. The rotation angles (α, β, γ) of the coordinates of the actual CTV relative to the planned CTV are calculated around the lateral (x), craniocaudal (y), and anteroposterior (z) axes of the planned CTV. The angles of the gantry head, collimator, and treatment couch of the linear accelerator are adjusted according to the rotation of the actual coordinates of the tumor in relation to the planned coordinates. We have measured the accuracy of 3D-CSU using a static cubic phantom. The gravity center of the phantom was corrected within 0.9 ± 0.3 mm (mean ± SD), 0.4 ± 0.2 mm, and 0.6 ± 0.2 mm for the rotation of the phantom from 0-30 degrees around the x, y, and z axes, respectively, every 5 degrees. Dose distribution was shown to be consistent with the planned dose distribution every 10 degrees of the rotation from 0-30 degrees. The mean rotational error after 3D-CSU was -0.4 ± 0.4 (mean ± SD), -0.2 ± 0.4, and 0.0 ± 0.5 degrees around the x, y, and z axis, respectively, for the rotation from 0-90 degrees. Phantom studies showed that 3D-CSU is useful for performing rotational correction of the target volume without correcting the position of the patient on the treatment couch. The 3D-CSU will be clinically useful for tumors in structures such as paraspinal diseases and prostate cancers not subject to large internal organ motion.
KW - Fiducial marker
KW - Linear accelerator
KW - Real-time tumor-tracking radiation therapy
KW - Real-time tumor-tracking system
KW - Rotation correction
KW - Rotational setup error
KW - Setup error
KW - Three-dimensional conformal setup
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4544375978&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4544375978&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.042
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.042
M3 - Article
C2 - 15380598
AN - SCOPUS:4544375978
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 60
SP - 607
EP - 612
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 2
ER -